Description: This large (540 page) document reviews the scientific evidence associated with the management of acute pain. It begins with a 28 page summary of the evidence in relation to the physiology and psychology of pain, assessment of pain, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and evidence for specific clinical situations such as pain associated with varying headache types. The main body of the guidelines present information supporting the recommendations. It begins with a useful 25 page review of physiological

and psychological aspects of acute pain followed by presentation of the levels of evidence for the assessment and measurement of pain. Chapter 4, dealing with acute pain, is of particular interest to physiotherapists and discusses a wide range Pictilisib of systemically administered analgesic drugs the proposed action, efficacy, and known side effects of each drug. this website Chapter 8 is also highly relevant to physiotherapists and deals with non pharmacological techniques including acupuncture, TENS, and ice. Chapter 9 deals with specific clinical situations including acute musculoskeletal pain and acute low back pain.

“
“Physiotherapy research activity, and the extent to which our clinical practice appears supported by good science, has grown at a dramatic rate. There are now over 19 000 clinical trials and almost 4000 systematic reviews relating to physiotherapy practice published worldwide (PEDro 2013) and this is likely to continue to expand. The exponential growth that has already occurred would have amazed physiotherapy researchers of 40 or 50 years ago who, while publishing the results of their diverse research studies in a wide range of general medical and physiotherapy journals, were seldom reporting randomised controlled trials. It is appropriate that

physiotherapy interventions should be based upon a strong theoretical framework and the best evidence available. Some authorities believe that this Histamine H2 receptor comes only through the conduct of systematic reviews of well-controlled clinical trials; specifically, from the metaanalyses of experimental studies with narrow confidence intervals ( Joanna Briggs Institute 2000). While not the opinion of all experts in evidence-based physiotherapy practice (eg, Herbert 2005), there has clearly been an enthusiastic uptake of the idea within our profession. In the most prestigious international physiotherapy journals the reporting of clinical trials and systematic reviews has been growing over the last ten years, as exemplified by the Journal of Physiotherapy and presented in Figure 1. Based upon this, we might feel that our clinical practice is increasingly informed by just the sort of research evidence that creates unambiguous direction. Sadly, however, that is not always the case.