As pointed out above, early transient anti-retroviral[5] and immunological interventions[16-19] have lasting effects on post-infection control of viraemia, persisting

long after the interventions[5, 16, 17, 19] are no longer present. At this point, it is important to recognize that Fc-mediated effector function in vivo requires two partners, an appropriate antibody and a functional effector cell. The studies outlined in Table 1 evaluated antibodies for ADCC activity using effector cells from uninfected individuals. Although positive correlations between ADCC titres and favourable clinical check details pictures were found, these studies do not speak to Fc-mediated effector function in the HIV-infected subjects because they did not examine autologous effector cells. As stated above, there is an early increase in effector cells early in infection accompanied by increased phagocytic activity.[27] However, phagocytosis[27] and natural

killer-mediated ADCC[63] are profoundly depressed during progressive HIV infection. Small molecule library order Hence, for these effector functions to impact the post-infection control of HIV, it is likely to be early infection where both partners are present. In summary, these studies strongly implicate Fc-mediated effector function in post-infection control of HIV. Further, they indicate that their efficacy is likely to be early infection, in Fiebig Stages V and VI, because both functional effector cells as well as appropriate antibodies must be present and autologous effector cell function wanes during chronic infection. Although the evidence is indirect, the effector mechanisms probably include ADCC, ADCVI and phagocytosis. Decitabine clinical trial Susceptibility of the acquisition phase to abrogation is established unequivocally by the CAPRISA 009

microbicide trial in at-risk women[64] and by the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) trial in men who have sex with men.[65] Both studies employed reverse transcriptase inhibitors, which prevent viral replication at a post-entry step. Hence, the protection against acquisition by these drugs must occur very early in the eclipse phase (Fig. 3), most likely either preventing a productive infection of the initial CD4+ CCR5+ T cell or possibly abrogating establishment of a small local founder population. These studies suggest that the ‘window of opportunity’ for blocking acquisition is around 3 days post-exposure (Fig. 3), consistent with similar studies in NHPs.[5] The window of opportunity is also framed by passive immunization studies in NHPs where transfer of protective neutralizing antibodies 24 hr after infection fails to prevent infection as mentioned above.[38, 39] A salient feature of HIV transmission is the low probability of infection per exposure.