“
“Background
and aims. Few randomized studies have assessed the clinical performance of 25-gauge (25G) needles compared with 22-gauge (22G) needles during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy of intra-abdominal lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic yield, as well as performance characteristics of 22G versus 25G EUS biopsy needles by determining their diagnostic capabilities, the number of needle passes as well as cellularity of aspirated tissue specimen. Methods. The study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Patients were referred between Forskolin January 2009 and January 2010 for diagnostic EUS including EUS-guided FNA of different lesions adjacent to the upper GI tract. All patients were randomized to EUS-FNA performed with either a 22G or 25G aspiration needle. Results. EUS-FNA was performed in 135
patients (62 patients with a 22G needle). Sensitivity and specificity of the 22G needle was 94.1% and 95.8%, respectively, and for the 25G needle 94.1% and 100%, respectively. Investigators reported better visualization and performance for the 22G needle compared to the 25G (p < 0.0001). The number of tissue slides obtained was higher for the 22G needle during the second and third needle passes (p < 0.05). We did not observe significant differences between the number and preservation status of obtained cells (p > 0.05). Conclusions. A significant difference was found between the two types of needles in terms of reduced visualization of the 25G needle and suboptimal performance rating. However, this did not impact on overall find more results since both needles were equally successful in terms of a high diagnostic yield and overall accuracy.”
“Objectives. Emergence of image-enhanced endoscopy has enabled an early detection of pharyngeal carcinoma. Progesterone Pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is sometimes difficult because of excessive reflexes and is a great burden to the patients and impacts on their cardiopulmonary function. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the utility of transnasal
EGD (TN-EGD) in comparison with sedated and unsedated transoral EGD (TO-EGD) in pharyngeal observation using a continuous monitoring device. Methods. A total of 70 patients receiving diagnostic EGD (unsedated TN-EGD, sedated TO-EGD, and unsedated TO-EGD) were enrolled in this study and were evaluated by the following three criteria: (1) numbers of patients with excessive gag and/or cough reflex, (2) vital signs before and during the pharyngeal observation, and (3) response to the request for vocalization or breath-holding. Results. Unsedated TN-EGD, sedated TO-EGD, and unsedated TO-EGD were performed in 30, 20, and 20 patients, respectively. The rate of gag reflex was significantly lower in TN-EGD than in both types of TO-EGD (0% vs. 30%, chi-square test, p < 0.005).