“
“Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2014, 21:170 This

review comes from a themed issue on Mechanisms Edited by AnnMarie C O’Donoghue and Shina CL Kamerlin For a complete overview see the Issue and the Editorial Available online 28th July 2014 1367-5931/$ – see front matter, © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.06.009 In the article originally published, a grant acknowledgment was inadvertently omitted: NCI Alliance of Glycobiologists for Detection of Cancer and Cancer RiskU01 CA168925. “
“In the December JACR (2013;10:12), Dr. Christoph Lee’s name was misspelled. His correct information is Christoph I. Lee, MD, MSHS. We regret Selleckchem GSK2118436 the error. “
“In the article titled: Delivery of Appropriateness, Quality, Safety, Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction by Giles W. Boland, MD, Richard Duszak Jr, MD, Geraldine McGinty, MD, MBA, Bibb Allen Jr, MD, there was an error in reference 20. The correct reference is: Breslau J, Lexa FJ. Radiologist’s Primer on

Accountable Care Organizations. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:164-8. “
“Landmark reports from the Institute of Medicine in the 1990s and 2000s revealed considerable gaps in the quality and safety of health care in the United States 1, 2 and 3. Since that time, public and private organizations and governments have increasingly focused on quality improvement, including the development Epigenetic high throughput screening of performance measures in medicine. A performance measure is a specific quantifiable indicator of an aspect of health care, expressed as a proportion or percentage of patients who are treated according to a specified standard. Performance measures typically focus on structures, processes, or outcomes of care 4 and 5. With appropriate benchmarks, performance measures allow health care practitioners to Phospholipase D1 identify areas within their practices that could be

improved 4 and 5. For example, the ACR National Radiology Data Registry provides benchmark information on numerous measures, allowing radiology practices to compare their performance measure data with other practices to determine performance gaps [6]. A sound methodologic approach to measuring these aspects of care should result in higher quality and more efficient care, as well as improved patient outcomes. Although the primary intent for using performance measures is to improve health care quality, public and private payers also increasingly use them as a mechanism to establish a financial incentive for practitioners to improve quality and reduce costs [7]. Performance measures are now used in a variety of programs that adjust payments on an individual practitioner, group, or institutional level.