The full-field stimulation threshold (FST) test originated to judge the efficacy and security of treatments of hereditary retinal diseases. In this research we performed the FST test in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and contrasted the results with conclusions from other ophthalmological examinations. The analysis included 51 intermediate and advanced level RP clients and 21 regular subjects. All customers and controls underwent routine evaluation and ophthalmological tests including visual field, optical coherence tomography, full-field and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG), and FST tests. During FST evaluation, the perception thresholds of retina to your white, blue, and red FST had been determined in decibels. The mean age the clients as well as the settings had been 35.2 and 33.5 years, respectively. For many RP clients, no reaction was gotten on full-field ERG. All topics were able to perform trustworthy FST tests. The mean values of artistic acuity and central macular depth were somewhat lower and visual industry mean deviation values were dramatically greater into the RP team compared to settings. When we evaluated the mfERG results, the mean P1 wave amplitudes in all rings were considerably lower additionally the mean peak times were significantly longer in RP customers than settings. In evaluations of FST test outcomes, the mean values for white, blue, red and the difference between blue-red thresholds were considerably lower in the RP team than the control team. The FST test is a quick and a trusted exam that can be done in topics with poor visual acuity and paid down aesthetic area read more . The outcomes of the study confirm that the FST test can measure retinal sensitiveness in severely impacted RP subjects with flat flash ERG.The FST test is a quick and a reliable exam which may be carried out in topics with bad aesthetic acuity and paid down artistic field. The outcomes of this research confirm that the FST test can measure retinal sensitivity in severely affected RP subjects with flat flash ERG. The documents of customers who delivered to our center between 2018 and 2022 with eyelid injury were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, reason for injury, medical findings Medullary AVM , accompanying ocular findings, and additional problems were examined. The research included 135 patients (106 male, 29 female) with a mean age of 37.0±18.6 years. Among the customers, 29 (21.4%) were 18 years of age or more youthful, 93 (68.8%) were between 19 and 64 yrs . old, and 13 (9.6percent) had been 65 yrs . old or older. EL had been many due to numerous sharp objects in 44 clients (33%), blunt traumatization in 40 patients (30%), drops in 30 patients (22%), and traffic accidents in 21 clients (15%). Fifteen eyes (11.1%) had foreign bodies during the wound site. Thirty clients (22.2%) (20 reduced eyelid, 10 top eyelid) had accompanying canalicular lacerations. Twenty-three (17%) patients had associated conjunctival lacerations, 14 (10.3%) had open-globe injury, 10 (7.4%) had corneal epithelial flaws, 9 (6.6%) had intravitreal hemorrhage, 6 (4.4%) had hyphema, and 5 (3.7%) had retinal detachment. Four patients had lid notching and 1 client (0.7%) had ectropion. Five patients (3.7%) needed suturing. No extra problems had been observed. EL tend to be more frequently observed in younger adulthood as well as in males. The most common apparatus of damage is influence by numerous items. Eyelash margin and canalicular lacerations frequently accompany these accidents. Serious ocular pathologies such as hyphema and open-globe injury can accompany eyelid injury.EL are far more frequently noticed in youthful adulthood plus in males. The most common method of injury is influence by different things. Eyelash margin and canalicular lacerations frequently accompany these injuries. Really serious ocular pathologies such hyphema and open-globe damage can come with eyelid upheaval. To gauge the usage of the Amsler grid test (AGT) in assessment for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), probably the most common reasons for loss of sight, in main health settings. The AGT ended up being applied to 700 eyes of 355 individuals aged 50 and over which applied to a family group wellness center in Ankara together with no eye grievances. The test had been considered good in the event that lines from the AGT card were regarded as damaged or curved, there was clearly immune therapy an improvement in form or size between the squares, or a color modification or blurring had been described in virtually any location. An ophthalmologist had been consulted in the event that AGT was positive in a single or both eyes. Customers considered suitable by ophthalmologists were evaluated with optical coherence tomography. AGT results had been compared with ophthalmologist evaluation and tomography results with regards to AMD recognition. The AGT ended up being good in 97 (13.9%) and bad in 603 (86.1%) away from 700 eyes within the study. A total of 184 eyes, 79 with an optimistic AGT and 105 eyes with a negative test, had been evaluated by an ophthalmologist. As a consequence of exams and tests carried out by ophthalmologists, AMD had been detected in a complete of 67 eyes 42 of 79 eyes with good AGT and 25 of 105 eyes with unfavorable AGT but regarded an ophthalmologist for different factors.