The travel destinations are mostly low- and middle-income countries representing the principal clients of the organization.
Current corporate road safety performance gives cause for concern, as on average one or two staff die annually and significantly more are injured on the roads while working in client countries. With a view to improve road safety policies and practices in the institution, we conducted a staff survey worldwide to collect epidemiological data on our business travelers’ exposure to road safety risks, their experience of road crashes and near crashes, and their suggestions for improved organizational road safety policies and practices. Our study presents a unique ranking of high-risk countries in terms of road safety and suggestions for improved corporate road safety practices. The aim
of the study was to investigate road safety Belinostat order problems among WBG business travelers, identify high-risk countries with respect to road safety and traveler safety concerns, and to suggest preventive strategies. A questionnaire was developed by the WBG Staff Road Safety Task Force to include questions about demographics, travel-related information, road safety concerns, crash and near crash ABT-199 manufacturer situations, safety experience with taxis, Bank vehicles and drivers, and other road safety issues in the Bank system. After initial testing and revision, the questionnaire (available on request) was adapted into an online survey. E-mail addresses of all 15,962 employees were Mirabegron obtained from the Human Resource (HR) Office, including 12,129 regular staff members and 3,833 consultants from the WBG. The online survey
was e-mailed to all subjects on March 12, 2008 and was after three reminders closed on April 13, 2008. In addition to data collected from the survey, data about WBG mission travel were extracted from the HR database for validation of self-reported travel history and analysis of reported events. The HR dataset contained information for the past 3 years on destination country and number of days so that risk exposure in each country could be measured in aggregate by “person-days. Initially, several indicators were used to measure the risk profile of countries with respect to road safety: 1 Number of reported road crashes This combined factor (indicators 4 and 5) was introduced to enlarge the number of reported events in each country, since the number of road crashes alone was too small to allow conclusions regarding distribution of risk per countries. SAS 9.1 was used for all statistical analysis and DevInfo 5.0 was used to develop maps. The cut-off rate for low, medium, and high risk was arbitrarily developed to provide similar-sized groups. For reasons of limited space, we only present a table and a map of high-risk countries based on the incidence rate of total number of crashes and near crashes (indicator 8).