This study examined the impact of several variables on combined a

This study examined the impact of several variables on combined all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiac causes, in consecutive ambulatory patients with HF included in the ALPHA registry.

Methods and Results: This analysis included 446 patients with HF and nonischemic heart disease, in New York Heart Association functional class II or III, and a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction below 40%. In 126 patients (73%) the disease was idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, in 72 (16%) hypertensive, in nine (2%) valvular, and in 39 (9%) of other etiologies. The median age was

61 years (range 51-69 years) and 349 (78%) patients were men. Over a median follow-up of 31 Immunology & Inflammation inhibitor months (range 23-40), 82 patients (18%) died or were hospitalized for cardiac causes. In a proportional hazard (Cox) regression model, maximal oxygen consumption (HR 0.9, P = 0.001), LV end-diastolic diameter (HR 1.07, P < 0.001), resting systolic blood pressure (HR 0.97, P < 0.005), and hemoglobin (HR 0.86, P < 0.05) were independent predictors of

the combined study endpoint.

Conclusions: In an unselected population of patients with HF and nonischemic heart disease, a reduced exercise capacity, large LV end-diastolic Z-VAD-FMK order diameter, low systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin were correlated with long-term all-cause mortality or hospitalization for cardiac causes. These observations may help stratifying and tailoring the treatment of patients with HF and nonischemic heart disease. (PACE 2009; 32:S214-S218)”
“BACKGROUND: Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are reported to be more specific for the diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) than the tuberculin Bcr-Abl inhibitor skin test (TST). The two-step procedure, TST followed by an IGRA, is reported to be cost-effective in high-income countries, but it requires more financial resources.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the added value of IGRA compared to TST alone in the Netherlands.

METHODS: Test results and background data on persons tested with an IGRA were recorded by the Public Municipal Health Services in a web-based database.

The number of persons diagnosed with LTBI using different screening algorithms was calculated.

RESULTS: In those tested with an IGRA, at least 60% of persons who would have been diagnosed with LTBI based on TST alone had a negative IGRA. Among those with a TST reaction below the cut-off for the diagnosis of LTBI, 13% had a positive IGRA. For 41% of persons tested with an IGRA after TST, the IGRA influenced whether or not an LTBI diagnosis would be made.

CONCLUSION: With the IGRA as reference standard, a high proportion of persons in low-prevalence settings are treated unnecessarily for LTBI if tested with TST alone, while a small proportion eligible for preventive treatment are missed. Incremental costs of the two-step strategy seem to be balanced by the improved targeting of preventive treatment.

Comments are closed.