Thus it should easily fit into the repertoire of treatment modalities of people with Type 2 diabetes. Ethics approval: The Brigham Young University-Hawaii and Louisiana State University Ethics Committees approved this study. All participants gave written informed consent before data collection began. Competing interests: None declared. “
“The participation of recreational Cyclopamine datasheet runners in non-elite races (also known as ‘fun runs’) has increased steadily over the last decade. For example, one of the biggest Brazilian race organisers reported a ten-fold increase in the number of runners who registered for fun runs between 2001 and 2010 (Corpore Brasil 2011). Unfortunately,

running is not an activity without risk, and one of the likely consequences of the popularity of running is that the absolute number of injuries in this population is also growing. Not surprisingly, the number of studies measuring the prevalence or incidence of injuries in runners has also increased, especially for marathon runners (Walter et al 1989, Satterthwaite et al 1999, Chorley

et al 2002, Fredericson and Misra 2007, van Gent et al 2007, van Middelkoop et al 2008, Buist et al 2010). Most reported injuries related to recreational running are overuse or gradual onset injuries, ie, injuries caused by repeated microtrauma without a single, identifiable event (Bahr 2009, Tonoli et al 2010). The majority of the studies cited above have identified these injuries with a definition related to time lost from sporting activity. However, most overuse injuries do not result in cessation of participation in sports (Lopes et al Selleck Panobinostat 2009, Tscholl et al 2008). Recent research has indicated the importance of describing overuse injuries in terms of pain and reduced performance (Bahr 2009). As the athlete does not always

recognise symptoms as an injury, a significant number of recreational runners might unknowingly be suffering an overuse injury while still participating (Lopes STK38 et al 2009). Therefore the aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of running-related musculoskeletal pain in recreational runners immediately before a race. We aimed to answer the following specific research questions: 1. What is the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in recreational runners who are about to compete in a race? We conducted a cross-sectional survey study from a convenience sample. These runners were recreational athletes preparing to compete in one of five different races in São Paulo, Brazil. In total, approximately 20 000 fun runners participated in these five races. The distance of these races ranged from 5000 to 10 000 metres. These races were chosen randomly from the fun run calendar of the city of São Paulo between August and December 2009. We aimed to survey 200 runners from each race. We included runners aged 18 years or over and we ensured that all participants completed the survey only once. The data were collected 2 hours or less before the start of each race.