UC1 formed cleistothecia-like structures in greater than 90% of confrontation assays within 6 weeks when paired with Mat1-2 clinical strains passaged for less than 6 months. UC1 maintained the ability to form cleistothecia for more than 4 years after generation of the strain from strain G217B. No cleistothecia were formed when UH3 and UC1 were paired with UH1 and VA1, respectively, two clinical strains that had been passaged for several months in the laboratory, consistent with previous reports that loss of mating competence occurred Fedratinib research buy after 5-8 months of continuous passage. The exact

timing of the loss of mating competence of H. capsulatum G217B is unknown as the strain was first reported in 1973 and has been maintained in culture since then. Nutrient limiting media was required for cleistothecia formation, as UC1 and UH3 did not form cleistothecia on nutrient-rich HMM. Figure 1 Cleistothecia formed by mating crosses. A: Cleistothecia formed by UH3 and UC1, DIC image, 400×. B: Cleistothecia formed

by UH3 and UC26, DIC image, 400×. C: Dissected cleistothecia from UH3 and UC26 pairing, DIC image, 400×. D: Alpha projection of Z-stack taken of cleistothecia formed by UH3 and UC1, confocal image of autofluorescence, 600×. The coiled surface hyphae are identified by short arrows while the net of short, branched hyphae are identified by long arrows. Figure 2 SEM images of cleistothecia formed GPX6 by UH3 and UC1. A: Dissected cleistothecia, 200×. B: View A, 1000×. C: View B, 2500×. D: Whole cleistothecia, 100×. E: View D, 500×. Vorinostat mw F: Microconidia, 2000×. In panels A and D, cleistothecia are identified

by symbol *, while coiled surface hyphae are identified by short arrows while the net of short, branched hyphae are identified by long arrows where appropriate. Cleistothecia were partially dissected to determine whether asci, containing ascospores, had been produced by the crosses. The cleistothecia appeared empty, as no clusters of club-shaped asci were visible by light microscopy (Figure 1C) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 2A-C) when structures were teased apart prior to visualization. Only what appear to be microconidia were observed by SEM when cleistothecia-like structures were dissected (Figure 2C, F). Alpha projections of Z-stacks taken by confocal microscopy also showed no evidence of asci (Figure 1D). Additionally UH3-Blast, a blasticidin resistant strain of UH3 was generated and crossed with UC1. Cleistothecia from this cross were dissected and transferred to plates containing hygromycin and blasticidin, where no growth was observed after several weeks. These results indicate that while the strain UC1 can form empty cleistothecia, it is unable to complete the mating process by this website producing asci and ascospores.