We report the 1-year clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacemen

We report the 1-year clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement JSH-23 mouse with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial.

Methods: Seventeen surgeons from 6 European centers treated 152 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement in a prospective, single-arm trial. A stented trileaflet bovine pericardial bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable, cloth-covered stent frame at the inflow aspect was implanted in 146 patients (mean age, 75.5 +/- 6.7 years; 52.7% were

female). Five valve sizes were evaluated (19-27 mm); 58.9% of cases had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 41.1% of cases involved concomitant procedures. Minimally invasive surgical approaches occurred in 48.8% of the isolated aortic valve replacements. Patients were followed at discharge, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

Results: Implantation success was 96.1% (146/152), early valve-related mortality was 1.4% (2/146), and cumulative survival was 92.5% at a mean follow-up of 9.8 +/- 5.1 months. Crossclamp time for isolated aortic valve replacement was 41.1 +/- 10.6 minutes. Independent core laboratory-adjudicated

mean effective orifice area and aortic valve pressure gradient were 1.7 +/- 0.2 cm(2) and 8.8 +/- 3.0 mm Hg at 3 months, and 1.7 +/- 0.2 cm(2) and 8.4 +/- 3.4 mm Hg at 1 year, respectively.

Conclusions: Implantation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System is feasible, safe, and efficacious for aortic valve replacement. Aortic crossclamp Entospletinib supplier and cardiopulmonary bypass times were reduced compared with those for conventional aortic valve replacement. Early hemodynamic performance was excellent and

remained so up to 1 year. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:110-6)”
“The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study revealed poorer antidepressant treatment response among black compared with white participants. This racial disparity persisted even after socioeconomic and baseline clinical factors Plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase were taken into account. Some studies have suggested genetic contributions to this disparity, but none have attempted to disentangle race and genetic ancestry. Here we used genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data to examine independent contributions of race and genetic ancestry to citalopram response. Secondary data analyses included 1877 STAR*D participants who completed an average of 10 weeks of citalopram treatment and provided DNA samples. Participants reported their race as White (n = 1464), black (n = 299) or other/mixed (n = 114). Genetic ancestry was estimated by multidimensional scaling (MDS) analyses of about 500 000 SNPs. Ancestry proportions were estimated by STRUCTURE.

Comments are closed.